What's up
 

Madelain, Paeye & Wallman, VSS 2008 (poster)
Saccadic adaptation: Reinforcement can drive motor adaptation

  AZ
 

Harwood, Madelain, Krauzlis & Wallman, Journal of Neurophysiology, 2008 (paper)
The spatial scale of attention strongly modulates saccade latencies

  AZ
 

Madelain, Champrenaut & Chauvin, Journal of Neurophysiology, 2007
Control of sensorimotor variability by consequences

  AZ
 

Madelain, Krauzlis & Wallman, Vision Research 2005 
Spatial deployment of attention influences both saccadic and pursuit tracking

  AZ
 

Wallman, Madelain & Krauzlis, VSS 2005 (poster)
Can saccades be selected by separate foci of attention in the two hemispheres ?

  AZ
 

Madelain, Harwood, Krauzlis & Wallman, VSS 2004 (poster)
Spatial scale of attention influences saccade latency (abstracts and posters)

  AZ
Madelain & Krauzlis, Journal of Neurophysiology, 2003
Effects of Learning on Smooth Pursuit During Transient Disappearance of a Visual Target (Pdf paper)
  AZ
  Pursuit of the ineffable: perceptual and motor reversals during the tracking of apparent motion, Madelain & Krauzlis, 2003.
Journal of vision, 3(11), 2003 (full text), part of the Special issue on linking eye movements and perception
See also the VSS 2003 poster and some demos
 

 

Research Topics

Eye movements in humans

Learning to track
Spatial scale of attention during pursuit
Pursuit of perceived motion


 

When tracking a visual target moving in the environment, we use a combination of saccadic and pursuit eye movements to center and stabilize the retinal images of objects of interest. Saccades are discrete movements that quickly direct the eyes toward a visual target, whereas pursuit is a continuous movement that smoothly rotates the eyes to compensate for any motion of the target.

Learning to track
I am investigating the effects of learning on pursuit in infants and in adults using operant conditioning procedures. With Jean-Claude Darcheville and collaborators we have shown that smooth pursuit development may depend upon the formation of learned behavioral contingencies. Some of these results were published in a paper in 1999 (Darcheville, J.-C.; Madelain, L.; Buquet, C.; Charlier, J.; Miossec, Y. (1999) Operant conditioning of the visual smooth pursuit in young infants. Behavioural Processes, 46,131-139.).
During my post-doc in Rich Krauzlis' lab at the Salk Institute for Biological Studies, in the Systems Neurobiology Laboratory I used a similar procedure in adults to investigate the effects of learning during the transient disappearance of the target. With Rich Krauzlis we found that subjects were able to learn to maintain pursuit with a velocity gain close to unity during periods of 1 second of target blanking. We also proposed a model that account for the observed reponses. We presented a poster at the Neural Control of Movement Society in 2002 and a paper appeared in Journal of Neurophysology in 2003.

Spatial scale of attention during pursuit
With Rich Krauzlis and Josh Wallman (from City College of the City University of New-York) we try to understand the role of attention in oculomotor tracking by manipulating the spatial scale of attention, and by measuring the eye movements evoked by perturbations of a tracked stimulus (left). We found that when the spatial scale of attention was small, perturbation-evoked saccades occurred more frequently, and had latencies that were shorter and less variable. Similarly, ramp perturbations imposed when the spatial scale of attention was small evoked larger changes in smooth pursuit eye velocity than when the spatial scale of attention was large. To probe the selectivity of attention, in additional experiments we perturbed only the central or peripheral part of the stimulus - we found that subjects differed in the extent to which they could suppress the response to the perturbation of the non-attended ring. By fitting the latency distributions with the Reddi and Carpenter LATER model, we found that we could group the responses of our subjects into several distinct strategies for changing latency as a function of the spatial scale of attention. A poster entitled "Attention affects catch-up saccades during smooth pursuit" was presented at the Society For Neurosciences 31st annual meeting (Madelain, L., Krauzlis, R.J., Wallman, J., 2001). More data were presented at VSS 2003 and 2004. A paper appeared in Vision Research (pp 2685-2703, 45, 20, 2005).
Demonstration of the ring stimuli used to study the effects of the spatial scale of attention on pursuit and saccades. The two rings are spinning in opposite direction (at 40 rpm for the large one and at 60 rpm for the inner one). The mask stimulus (11 segments in both ring) is displayed for two seconds. The probe stimulus appears for a short period of time (here 4 frames i.e. about 160 ms) and then the mask returns for the rest of the trial (here one second). The task of the subject is to report the number of segments in either the large or small inner ring during the brief period when the probe stimulus is present. Here the probe stimulus has 5 segments in the large ring and 4 in the inner one.
Pursuit of perceived motion
I am currently working on the relationship between smooth pursuit eye movements and perception of motion with Rich Krauzlis. Monitoring eye movements during pursuit of apparent motion we have shown that the perceived motion of an object can drive pursuit, even when the motion is perceptually bistable and the object itself is illusory. We found that smooth pursuit and the perception of motion direction are in temporal register, indicating that pursuit can provide a real-time readout for the state of motion perception. We presented a poster at the VisionScienceS Society in May 2003 on these results (poster + demos here). A paper entitled "Pursuit of the ineffable: perceptual and motor reversals during the tracking of apparent motion" appeared in Journal of Vision, 3(11), 2003. Below is an example of the bi-directional stimulus we used (you can see a rightward or leftward motion and switch perceived direction at will).